Australian vs Brazilian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,334,636 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.079. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 18.7 Brazilians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $46,700, a difference of 11.5%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $106,942, a difference of 10.7%), and median male earnings ($62,857 compared to $56,837, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $54,335, a difference of 1.1%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $40,483, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.5%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 15.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.010%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.3%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.32%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 12.1%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (62.8% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 15.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.5%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 18.0%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.45%), 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.26%), female disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.28%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.82%).