Chippewa vs Brazilian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,231,516 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 5.6 Brazilians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $46,700, a difference of 27.5%), median household income ($70,539 compared to $88,934, a difference of 26.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,943 compared to $104,408, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $61,465, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $54,335, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 43.1%), single male poverty (16.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 39.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 73.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 42.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.80%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 16.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 40.3%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 38.7%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.55%), family households (62.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 40.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.74%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 44.9%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 43.9%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.5% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.25%), high school diploma (89.7% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.50%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 42.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 41.2%), and hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.3%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.4%).