Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Brazilian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Oceania

Brazilians

Average
Good
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Brazilian Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,550,415 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Brazilians within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Brazilians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 7.4 Brazilians.
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Brazilian Communities

Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $61,465, a difference of 4.8%), wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $46,700, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($89,100 compared to $88,934, a difference of 0.19%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $106,942, a difference of 0.46%), and median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $40,483, a difference of 0.46%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Income
Income MetricImmigrants from OceaniaBrazilian
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,220
Exceptional
$46,700
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,453
Excellent
$106,942
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,100
Exceptional
$88,934
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,617
Exceptional
$48,356
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,712
Exceptional
$56,837
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,297
Excellent
$40,483
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,680
Exceptional
$54,335
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,623
Excellent
$98,267
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,705
Excellent
$104,408
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,416
Good
$61,465
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.6%
Tragic
26.7%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.050%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from OceaniaBrazilian
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Good
11.9%
Families
Good
8.7%
Excellent
8.6%
Males
Average
11.2%
Excellent
10.8%
Females
Average
13.3%
Excellent
13.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Exceptional
18.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Excellent
13.1%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Excellent
16.4%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Excellent
15.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Excellent
15.8%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Excellent
15.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
11.8%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Good
28.7%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Good
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Poor
11.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
12.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Excellent
11.1%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.45%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from OceaniaBrazilian
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Average
5.3%
Males
Average
5.3%
Good
5.2%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
17.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Average
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Fair
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Average
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Fair
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.8%, a difference of 0.47%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from OceaniaBrazilian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Excellent
37.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
83.7%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.3%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.18, a difference of 3.4%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.5% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.20%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 0.63%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from OceaniaBrazilian
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Poor
63.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Good
27.7%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Fair
46.2%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Average
6.2%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Fair
46.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Average
12.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.6%
Excellent
30.4%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 41.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.39%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 53.8%, a difference of 7.0%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaBrazilian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Good
90.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Tragic
53.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Tragic
17.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
5.4%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 12.8%), bachelor's degree (37.3% compared to 40.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.080%), 5th grade (97.1% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.15%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from OceaniaBrazilian
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Good
2.1%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Average
97.9%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Average
97.5%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Average
94.9%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Good
93.8%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Good
86.3%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Good
65.9%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Good
60.5%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
48.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.3%
Exceptional
40.8%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Exceptional
16.5%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.1%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Brazilian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and female disability (12.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Brazilian Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaBrazilian
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Exceptional
11.4%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Exceptional
22.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Exceptional
46.5%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Good
17.1%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%