Chilean vs Native/Alaskan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Chilean
Native/Alaskan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Chileans
Natives/Alaskans
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chilean vs Native/Alaskan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,415,237 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.700 and weighted average of 19.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,027,149 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 41.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chilean | Native/Alaskan |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 8.3% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 73.3% |
| Range | 98.2% | 65.1% |
| Mean | 25.9% | 37.0% |
| Median | 19.9% | 36.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.8% | 30.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.0% | 42.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.2% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.4% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.1% | 10.1% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (19.9%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and Native Hawaiian (19.9%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Demographics Similar to Natives/Alaskans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 0.64%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 0.68%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |