Dominican vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Dominican
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Dominicans

Burmese

Tragic
Exceptional
590
SOCIAL INDEX
3.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
342nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Dominican Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,908,393 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Dominican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.389. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dominicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dominicans corresponds to a decrease of 12.4 Burmese.
Dominican Integration in Burmese Communities

Dominican vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dominican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($46,964 compared to $71,139, a difference of 51.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,623 compared to $121,444, a difference of 50.6%), and median family income ($82,888 compared to $123,369, a difference of 48.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,633 compared to $54,800, a difference of 10.4%), median female earnings ($37,046 compared to $44,911, a difference of 21.2%), and median earnings ($41,864 compared to $54,559, a difference of 30.3%).
Dominican vs Burmese Income
Income MetricDominicanBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$37,697
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,888
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$71,302
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,864
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$47,204
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,046
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,633
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,229
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$80,623
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$46,964
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.6%
Tragic
28.0%

Dominican vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dominican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 147.0%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 95.9%), and married-couple family poverty (8.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 92.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 17.7%), single father poverty (19.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 23.4%), and single male poverty (15.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 29.8%).
Dominican vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricDominicanBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.3%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
24.0%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
23.8%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
15.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.4%
Exceptional
8.6%

Dominican vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dominican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (7.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 54.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 50.8%), and unemployment (7.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 49.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.0%).
Dominican vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricDominicanBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
15.7%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
13.8%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Average
8.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
4.9%

Dominican vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dominican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.4%).
Dominican vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricDominicanBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.2%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.1%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.2%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.3%
Exceptional
83.6%

Dominican vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dominican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (9.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 73.6%), births to unmarried women (39.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 51.1%), and married-couple households (38.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.6%), family households (63.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and average family size (3.34 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.8%).
Dominican vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricDominicanBurmese
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
38.2%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.34
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.5%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.8%
Exceptional
26.4%

Dominican vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dominican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 204.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 94.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 84.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 27.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 63.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 84.0%).
Dominican vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricDominicanBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
29.4%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
70.7%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
35.3%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.2%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
6.8%

Dominican vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dominican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 94.7%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 73.3%), and no schooling completed (3.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.3%).
Dominican vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricDominicanBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.8%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.4%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.8%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.1%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.7%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.7%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
55.5%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.6%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
39.3%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.6%

Dominican vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dominican and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 39.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age over 75 (50.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 9.2%).
Dominican vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricDominicanBurmese
Disability
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.2%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%