British vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 449,118,424 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within British communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British corresponds to a decrease of 16.5 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($88,914 compared to $103,145, a difference of 16.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,359 compared to $113,701, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,264 compared to $121,444, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,477 compared to $54,800, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,940 compared to $71,139, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 23.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 19.7%), and single female poverty (21.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.36%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.47%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 16.9%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.31%), family households (64.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 27.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.1%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 22.1%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.9% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 32.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 26.2%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.5%).