Liberian vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Liberian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Liberians

Burmese

Poor
Exceptional
1,824
SOCIAL INDEX
15.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
286th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Liberian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,056,820 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Liberian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.339. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Liberians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.049% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Liberians corresponds to a decrease of 49.4 Burmese.
Liberian Integration in Burmese Communities

Liberian vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Liberian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,005 compared to $113,701, a difference of 38.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,929 compared to $121,444, a difference of 36.6%), and median household income ($75,667 compared to $103,145, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($48,917 compared to $54,800, a difference of 12.0%), median female earnings ($38,215 compared to $44,911, a difference of 17.5%), and median earnings ($43,536 compared to $54,559, a difference of 25.3%).
Liberian vs Burmese Income
Income MetricLiberianBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,780
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,722
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,667
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,536
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,318
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,215
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,917
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,005
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,929
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,356
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
28.0%

Liberian vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Liberian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 71.1%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 52.8%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (20.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 3.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 8.9%).
Liberian vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricLiberianBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
10.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.6%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.5%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
22.4%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Excellent
16.0%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.9%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
8.6%

Liberian vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Liberian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 36.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 6.7%).
Liberian vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLiberianBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.4%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.8%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Liberian vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Liberian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.8% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 21.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.8% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.9% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.78%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Liberian vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLiberianBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.8%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.9%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.8%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.0%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.4%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.7%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Excellent
83.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Liberian vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Liberian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 63.4%), births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 41.8%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.79%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.0%), and family households (62.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 6.1%).
Liberian vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLiberianBurmese
Family Households
Tragic
62.0%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.3%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
40.7%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
42.2%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.4%
Exceptional
26.4%

Liberian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.9%), no vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 23.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 21.5%).
Liberian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLiberianBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.0%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.0%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.7%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
6.8%

Liberian vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Liberian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 73.4%), professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 73.0%), and master's degree (12.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 53.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.9% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.41%), 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and 2nd grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
Liberian vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricLiberianBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Poor
90.8%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.7%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
85.0%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.0%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.7%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.3%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Liberian vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Liberian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 40.5%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.6%).
Liberian vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricLiberianBurmese
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Excellent
2.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%