Guamanian/Chamorro vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Guamanian/Chamorro
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Guamanians/Chamorros

Burmese

Fair
Exceptional
4,082
SOCIAL INDEX
38.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
205th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Guamanian/Chamorro Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,337,486 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.309% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to an increase of 308.9 Burmese.
Guamanian/Chamorro Integration in Burmese Communities

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,678 compared to $52,005, a difference of 24.8%), median family income ($101,061 compared to $123,369, a difference of 22.1%), and median male earnings ($53,661 compared to $65,236, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $54,800, a difference of 2.6%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $71,139, a difference of 12.6%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Burmese Income
Income MetricGuamanian/ChamorroBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,678
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,061
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Good
$86,255
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,933
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,661
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,717
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,423
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$93,569
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,170
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,187
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.0%
Tragic
28.0%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 34.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.45%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.5%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricGuamanian/ChamorroBurmese
Poverty
Good
12.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Good
13.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.4%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.5%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
8.6%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.1%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricGuamanian/ChamorroBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Poor
17.9%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Fair
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.9%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 10.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.5%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricGuamanian/ChamorroBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.2%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.7%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.5%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
83.6%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.9%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 25.7%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 3.6%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricGuamanian/ChamorroBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
66.6%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.7%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.1%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Average
31.6%
Exceptional
26.4%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 21.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 12.5%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricGuamanian/ChamorroBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.5%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.2%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
6.8%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 63.5%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 61.6%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricGuamanian/ChamorroBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Fair
97.7%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Fair
97.4%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Fair
97.2%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Fair
97.0%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Fair
95.9%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Average
92.5%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.3%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.4%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.6%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.8%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.6%

Guamanian/Chamorro vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 32.9%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 7.6%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 9.7%).
Guamanian/Chamorro vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricGuamanian/ChamorroBurmese
Disability
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Average
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.4%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%