Hawaiian vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 303,208,208 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.238. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.020% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 20.4 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $52,005, a difference of 32.0%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $65,236, a difference of 29.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,722 compared to $113,701, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $54,800, a difference of 3.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $71,139, a difference of 9.6%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 49.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 31.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.97%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 25.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 23.4%), and male unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.8%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 26.0%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.73%), family households (67.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.0%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 4.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 80.2%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 78.4%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 70.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.18%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 33.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 23.8%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.6%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.5%).