Lumbee vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 87,844,983 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.570. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 10.6 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($54,644 compared to $103,145, a difference of 88.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($60,305 compared to $113,701, a difference of 88.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($65,113 compared to $121,444, a difference of 86.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 31.4%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $44,911, a difference of 38.2%), and median earnings ($36,876 compared to $54,559, a difference of 47.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (22.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 164.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (33.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 151.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (31.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 146.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 64.2%), single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 64.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 69.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 112.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 81.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (70.6% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 13.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 82.8%), single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 72.1%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 36.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.32 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.2%), family households (63.1% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 12.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.77%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 149.5%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 141.9%), and master's degree (9.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 112.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.0% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.090%), 7th grade (96.6% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and 6th grade (97.6% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.32%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (17.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 91.6%), vision disability (3.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 83.0%), and ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 80.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 14.7%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.1%), and disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 22.5%).