Samoan vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Samoan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Samoans

Burmese

Fair
Exceptional
4,237
SOCIAL INDEX
39.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
202nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Samoan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 215,106,117 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to a decrease of 22.5 Burmese.
Samoan Integration in Burmese Communities

Samoan vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,826 compared to $52,005, a difference of 30.6%), median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $65,236, a difference of 26.9%), and median earnings ($44,206 compared to $54,559, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,610 compared to $54,800, a difference of 0.35%), wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $71,139, a difference of 8.7%).
Samoan vs Burmese Income
Income MetricSamoanBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,826
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,344
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Good
$86,498
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,206
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,389
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,498
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,610
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,385
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$101,580
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,427
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.0%
Tragic
28.0%

Samoan vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 39.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 24.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.60%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.82%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Samoan vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricSamoanBurmese
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Good
8.6%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Good
10.9%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Good
13.1%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.2%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.6%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Good
20.6%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.1%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
8.6%

Samoan vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Samoan vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSamoanBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%

Samoan vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Samoan vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSamoanBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.5%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.1%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.3%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.2%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.6%

Samoan vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.0%), births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 23.7%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.7% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (67.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households with children (29.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.5%).
Samoan vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSamoanBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
67.9%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.42
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Average
46.8%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Fair
32.6%
Exceptional
26.4%

Samoan vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 35.1%), no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 20.9%).
Samoan vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSamoanBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.5%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
25.0%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
6.8%

Samoan vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 85.4%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 84.7%), and master's degree (11.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.32%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.32%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.32%).
Samoan vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricSamoanBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.8%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Poor
94.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.8%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Poor
88.5%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.0%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.2%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.1%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.6%

Samoan vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 31.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 23.4%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 7.8%).
Samoan vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricSamoanBurmese
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.5%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%