Yup'ik vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Yup'ik
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaScotlandSerbiaSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Yup'ik

Burmese

Fair
Exceptional
2,388
SOCIAL INDEX
21.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
262nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Yup'ik Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,221,558 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Yup'ik communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.270. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Yup'ik within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Yup'ik corresponds to a decrease of 6.5 Burmese.
Yup'ik Integration in Burmese Communities

Yup'ik vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,518 compared to $52,005, a difference of 70.4%), median male earnings ($39,504 compared to $65,236, a difference of 65.1%), and median family income ($79,290 compared to $123,369, a difference of 55.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,732 compared to $54,800, a difference of 0.12%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,727 compared to $71,139, a difference of 17.1%).
Yup'ik vs Burmese Income
Income MetricYup'ikBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,518
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$79,290
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,695
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$35,942
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,504
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$32,730
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,732
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$73,688
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,000
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,727
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Tragic
28.0%

Yup'ik vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (32.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 277.8%), married-couple family poverty (13.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 210.0%), and single male poverty (31.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 169.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (32.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 23.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 35.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 39.5%).
Yup'ik vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricYup'ikBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.1%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
24.7%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
31.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.5%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
32.7%
Exceptional
8.6%

Yup'ik vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (18.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 258.8%), male unemployment (16.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 234.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (14.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 234.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (12.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 56.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (9.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 81.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (9.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 82.5%).
Yup'ik vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricYup'ikBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
23.7%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
41.0%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
9.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Yup'ik vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (73.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 16.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (76.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.2% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.9% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.7% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 5.6%).
Yup'ik vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricYup'ikBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.7%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
73.2%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.3%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.9%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
73.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
76.4%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.3%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.6%
Exceptional
83.6%

Yup'ik vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (5.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 164.8%), births to unmarried women (56.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 114.1%), and single mother households (10.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 89.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 4.2%), family households (72.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and married-couple households (44.1% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 13.0%).
Yup'ik vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricYup'ikBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
72.4%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
37.0%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.1%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
4.00
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.9%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
56.4%
Exceptional
26.4%

Yup'ik vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (45.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 374.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (34.9% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 65.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 20.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (14.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 39.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 54.7%).
Yup'ik vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricYup'ikBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
45.9%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
58.4%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
6.8%

Yup'ik vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (19.4% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 141.5%), master's degree (8.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 130.5%), and associate's degree (25.0% compared to 54.6%, a difference of 118.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.29%), 5th grade (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and 6th grade (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.76%).
Yup'ik vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricYup'ikBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.2%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
99.2%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
99.2%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
99.2%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
99.0%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.1%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.0%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
45.8%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
39.4%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
25.0%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.6%

Yup'ik vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Yup'ik and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 303.1%), hearing disability (5.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 108.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 83.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.22%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 2.5%).
Yup'ik vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricYup'ikBurmese
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
4.5%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
37.8%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
61.1%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.3%