Italian vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Italian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Italians

Burmese

Excellent
Exceptional
8,365
SOCIAL INDEX
81.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
74th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Italian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,119,041 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Italian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.464. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Italians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Italians corresponds to a decrease of 8.9 Burmese.
Italian Integration in Burmese Communities

Italian vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Italian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($92,475 compared to $103,145, a difference of 11.5%), householder income over 65 years ($63,885 compared to $71,139, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,224 compared to $121,444, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.35%), householder income under 25 years ($53,426 compared to $54,800, a difference of 2.6%), and median female earnings ($41,505 compared to $44,911, a difference of 8.2%).
Italian vs Burmese Income
Income MetricItalianBurmese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,574
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,372
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$92,475
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,915
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,551
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,505
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,426
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,215
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$110,224
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,885
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Tragic
28.0%

Italian vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Italian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 17.3%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and single father poverty (17.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.17%), poverty (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.50%), and male poverty (9.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.66%).
Italian vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricItalianBurmese
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.3%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
8.6%

Italian vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Italian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
Italian vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricItalianBurmese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%

Italian vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Italian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 16.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.38%).
Italian vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricItalianBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.1%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Exceptional
83.6%

Italian vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Italian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 16.7%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.24%), family households (64.8% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and married-couple households (49.0% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Italian vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricItalianBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.0%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.12
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.8%
Exceptional
26.4%

Italian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Italian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.34%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Italian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricItalianBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.4%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
6.8%

Italian vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Italian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.4%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.0%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.2% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.11%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%).
Italian vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricItalianBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.2%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.2%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.1%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.1%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Exceptional
2.6%

Italian vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Italian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 0.76%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.8%).
Italian vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricItalianBurmese
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.6%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%