Immigrants from Portugal vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Portugal
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Portugal

Burmese

Poor
Exceptional
2,067
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
271st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Immigrants from Portugal Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,224,128 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Immigrant from Portugal communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Portugal within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.063% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Portugal corresponds to a decrease of 62.7 Burmese.
Immigrants from Portugal Integration in Burmese Communities

Immigrants from Portugal vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($55,924 compared to $71,139, a difference of 27.2%), per capita income ($42,412 compared to $52,005, a difference of 22.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,203 compared to $121,444, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,105 compared to $54,800, a difference of 1.3%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and median female earnings ($39,788 compared to $44,911, a difference of 12.9%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Burmese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PortugalBurmese
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,412
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Fair
$100,984
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Average
$84,740
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Good
$47,304
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,182
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,788
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,105
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,512
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$99,203
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,924
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
28.0%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 64.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 34.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (17.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.9%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.5% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 14.2%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PortugalBurmese
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Fair
9.4%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Average
11.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Average
13.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.8%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Poor
17.4%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.5%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
8.6%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.4%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PortugalBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.0%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Fair
17.8%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.5%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.3%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PortugalBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.7%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.8%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Fair
84.6%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 37.2%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 35.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.81%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PortugalBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.2%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Exceptional
26.4%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 21.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 10.7%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PortugalBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.3%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
6.8%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 74.3%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 73.2%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 56.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.75%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.75%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PortugalBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.9%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.8%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.6%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.3%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.6%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.7%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
51.9%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.1%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.2%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.5%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.6%

Immigrants from Portugal vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Portugal and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 59.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 35.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 34.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.8%).
Immigrants from Portugal vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PortugalBurmese
Disability
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.6%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.3%