Hopi vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hopi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKenyaKoreaLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hopi

Burmese

Poor
Exceptional
1,478
SOCIAL INDEX
12.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
306th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Hopi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,066,879 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Hopi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.758. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hopi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.148% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hopi corresponds to an increase of 148.2 Burmese.
Hopi Integration in Burmese Communities

Hopi vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hopi and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($31,177 compared to $52,005, a difference of 66.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,562 compared to $121,444, a difference of 60.7%), and median family income ($77,188 compared to $123,369, a difference of 59.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($46,978 compared to $54,800, a difference of 16.7%), median female earnings ($33,932 compared to $44,911, a difference of 32.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,925 compared to $71,139, a difference of 39.7%).
Hopi vs Burmese Income
Income MetricHopiBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$31,177
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,188
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$65,043
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,871
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,060
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,932
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,978
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$75,002
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$75,562
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,925
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.0%
Tragic
28.0%

Hopi vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hopi and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 149.2%), single male poverty (27.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 134.6%), and family poverty (15.9% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 117.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 31.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 49.2%), and single female poverty (28.0% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 53.4%).
Hopi vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricHopiBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
25.9%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
27.9%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
27.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
28.0%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
17.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
18.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.6%
Exceptional
8.6%

Hopi vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hopi and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (16.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 158.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (11.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 131.9%), and male unemployment (10.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 119.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.1%).
Hopi vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHopiBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
21.5%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
30.7%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
19.9%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
16.8%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
4.9%

Hopi vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hopi and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (58.4% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 13.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (71.7% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (75.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.3% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.1%).
Hopi vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHopiBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
58.4%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
71.7%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.8%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
66.0%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
76.5%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.3%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
77.0%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Hopi vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hopi and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (50.8% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 92.8%), single mother households (8.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 60.3%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.76%), average family size (3.60 compared to 3.22, a difference of 11.8%), and family households with children (25.2% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 12.9%).
Hopi vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHopiBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
65.3%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.2%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
36.7%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.60
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.5%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
50.8%
Exceptional
26.4%

Hopi vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 41.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 17.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.82%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 13.7%).
Hopi vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHopiBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.7%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.4%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
49.0%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.9%
Exceptional
6.8%

Hopi vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hopi and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (25.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 85.3%), master's degree (10.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 81.2%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and 7th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.060%).
Hopi vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricHopiBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Good
97.5%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Good
97.2%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Good
95.9%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Fair
94.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.6%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
86.6%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
57.1%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.9%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.6%

Hopi vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hopi and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (4.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 312.3%), vision disability (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 57.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 50.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 7.4%), disability age over 75 (52.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 15.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.8%).
Hopi vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricHopiBurmese
Disability
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
4.6%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.5%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
30.0%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
52.9%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%