Immigrants from Latin America vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Latin America
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Latin America

Burmese

Poor
Exceptional
1,392
SOCIAL INDEX
11.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
311th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Immigrants from Latin America Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 460,513,753 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.619. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 12.8 Burmese.
Immigrants from Latin America Integration in Burmese Communities

Immigrants from Latin America vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($86,989 compared to $123,369, a difference of 41.8%), per capita income ($36,823 compared to $52,005, a difference of 41.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,219 compared to $121,444, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $54,800, a difference of 6.6%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 18.0%), and median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $44,911, a difference of 27.2%).
Immigrants from Latin America vs Burmese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Latin AmericaBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,823
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,989
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,420
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,049
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,941
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,307
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,387
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,219
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,265
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Tragic
28.0%

Immigrants from Latin America vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 81.2%), married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 66.7%), and family poverty (11.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 4.4%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 6.0%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.3%).
Immigrants from Latin America vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Latin AmericaBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.4%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
8.6%

Immigrants from Latin America vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 32.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 29.4%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.9%).
Immigrants from Latin America vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Latin AmericaBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.6%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.0%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Latin America vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Immigrants from Latin America vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Latin AmericaBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.3%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.9%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.1%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
83.6%

Immigrants from Latin America vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 49.6%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 40.9%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (29.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.2%), and average family size (3.42 compared to 3.22, a difference of 6.5%).
Immigrants from Latin America vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Latin AmericaBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
67.2%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.7%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.7%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.42
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.8%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.1%
Exceptional
26.4%

Immigrants from Latin America vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.51%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from Latin America vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Latin AmericaBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
89.8%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
6.8%

Immigrants from Latin America vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 102.2%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 86.3%), and master's degree (11.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 74.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.4%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Latin America vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Latin AmericaBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.3%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
86.8%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.0%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.5%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.3%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.7%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.1%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.6%

Immigrants from Latin America vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 31.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 24.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.3%).
Immigrants from Latin America vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Latin AmericaBurmese
Disability
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.5%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.3%