Luxembourger vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,823,661 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.172. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.041% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 41.3 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($86,418 compared to $103,145, a difference of 19.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $121,444, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $113,701, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $54,800, a difference of 8.8%), and median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $44,911, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and single female poverty (20.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.020%), poverty (10.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.82%), and family poverty (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.3%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 13.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 31.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 11.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.3% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.67%), married-couple households (48.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.22, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 80.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 4.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.1%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 33.1%), and master's degree (15.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.6% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 17.3%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.8%).