Immigrants from South America vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 431,481,928 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Immigrant from South America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.529. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South America corresponds to a decrease of 19.5 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($100,414 compared to $123,369, a difference of 22.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,126 compared to $121,444, a difference of 22.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,042 compared to $113,701, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,268 compared to $54,800, a difference of 0.98%), median female earnings ($39,643 compared to $44,911, a difference of 13.3%), and wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 48.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 32.9%), and family poverty (9.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.0%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.63%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 0.31%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.0%), births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 21.2%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.17%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 31.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.7% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 23.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 15.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 49.9%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 32.6%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South America and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.1%).