Creek vs Burmese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,379,121 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.546. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.076% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 76.2 Burmese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $121,444, a difference of 53.8%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $103,145, a difference of 52.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $113,701, a difference of 51.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.3%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $54,800, a difference of 20.8%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $44,911, a difference of 34.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 83.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 71.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 68.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.2% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 28.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.3% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 42.5%), divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 34.5%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.20 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.54%), family households (64.2% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 24.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.82%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 98.4%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 95.7%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 87.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.22%), 10th grade (94.2% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 83.3%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 73.3%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 59.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 9.6%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 25.5%).