Seminole vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Seminole
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Seminole

Burmese

Poor
Exceptional
2,239
SOCIAL INDEX
19.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
265th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Seminole Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,689,918 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Seminole communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.343. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Seminole within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Seminole corresponds to an increase of 19.9 Burmese.
Seminole Integration in Burmese Communities

Seminole vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Seminole and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,077 compared to $121,444, a difference of 51.7%), median household income ($69,420 compared to $103,145, a difference of 48.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,584 compared to $113,701, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 9.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,649 compared to $54,800, a difference of 20.1%), and median female earnings ($34,385 compared to $44,911, a difference of 30.6%).
Seminole vs Burmese Income
Income MetricSeminoleBurmese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,180
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Tragic
$83,354
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,420
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,233
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,783
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,385
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,649
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,584
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$80,077
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,373
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.6%
Tragic
28.0%

Seminole vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Seminole and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.8% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 72.6%), receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 71.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 66.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.9%), single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 17.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.3%).
Seminole vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricSeminoleBurmese
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Tragic
16.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.8%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
8.6%

Seminole vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Seminole and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 34.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.12%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.0%).
Seminole vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSeminoleBurmese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Seminole vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Seminole and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 5.4%).
Seminole vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSeminoleBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.0%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.5%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.1%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.3%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.4%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.1%
Exceptional
83.6%

Seminole vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Seminole and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 43.8%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 39.8%), and divorced or separated (14.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.72%), family households (64.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Seminole vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSeminoleBurmese
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.0%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
26.4%

Seminole vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Seminole and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 7.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 0.76%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.9%).
Seminole vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSeminoleBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.1%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
6.8%

Seminole vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Seminole and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 98.0%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 92.4%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 78.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 5th grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.010%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.030%).
Seminole vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricSeminoleBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Good
96.2%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Good
95.8%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Average
94.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Poor
93.3%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.3%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.1%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.1%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.7%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.6%

Seminole vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Seminole and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 72.1%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 65.4%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 52.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 10.1%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 12.1%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.3%).
Seminole vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricSeminoleBurmese
Disability
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.5%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.3%