Bolivian vs Burmese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bolivian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bolivians

Burmese

Excellent
Exceptional
8,880
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
42nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Burmese Integration in Bolivian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,316,925 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese within Bolivian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bolivians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Burmese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bolivians corresponds to an increase of 35.8 Burmese.
Bolivian Integration in Burmese Communities

Bolivian vs Burmese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($61,066 compared to $65,236, a difference of 6.8%), householder income under 25 years ($58,506 compared to $54,800, a difference of 6.8%), and per capita income ($49,526 compared to $52,005, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($102,195 compared to $103,145, a difference of 0.93%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,871 compared to $121,444, a difference of 2.2%), and median family income ($119,479 compared to $123,369, a difference of 3.3%).
Bolivian vs Burmese Income
Income MetricBolivianBurmese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,526
Exceptional
$52,005
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,479
Exceptional
$123,369
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$102,195
Exceptional
$103,145
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,005
Exceptional
$54,559
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,066
Exceptional
$65,236
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,445
Exceptional
$44,911
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,506
Exceptional
$54,800
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,372
Exceptional
$113,701
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$118,871
Exceptional
$121,444
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$74,245
Exceptional
$71,139
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.8%
Tragic
28.0%

Bolivian vs Burmese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 8.4%), receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.0%), single mother poverty (25.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and single female poverty (17.9% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 2.0%).
Bolivian vs Burmese Poverty
Poverty MetricBolivianBurmese
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.4%
Exceptional
18.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Exceptional
13.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
12.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Exceptional
13.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
13.0%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.9%
Exceptional
18.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.7%
Exceptional
15.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.9%
Exceptional
26.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
8.6%

Bolivian vs Burmese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.42%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Bolivian vs Burmese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBolivianBurmese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Excellent
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.3%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Excellent
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Excellent
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%

Bolivian vs Burmese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.2% compared to 66.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.1% compared to 85.3%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Bolivian vs Burmese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBolivianBurmese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
66.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.7%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.0%
Tragic
34.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Tragic
73.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.3%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.9%
Exceptional
83.6%

Bolivian vs Burmese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.9%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.0%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (49.2% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 1.8%).
Bolivian vs Burmese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBolivianBurmese
Family Households
Exceptional
66.5%
Exceptional
65.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.2%
Exceptional
49.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Fair
3.22
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.1%
Exceptional
48.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
26.4%

Bolivian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.7%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.94%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 0.34%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.90%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.94%).
Bolivian vs Burmese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBolivianBurmese
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Excellent
9.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.5%
Excellent
90.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.3%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Exceptional
20.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.8%

Bolivian vs Burmese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 22.5%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 11.4%), and professional degree (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%).
Bolivian vs Burmese Education Level
Education Level MetricBolivianBurmese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Excellent
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Excellent
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Excellent
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Excellent
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Good
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Excellent
97.5%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Excellent
97.3%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.2%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Exceptional
90.8%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.4%
Exceptional
88.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.7%
Exceptional
71.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.5%
Exceptional
66.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.0%
Exceptional
54.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.6%
Exceptional
46.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.3%
Exceptional
19.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
6.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.6%

Bolivian vs Burmese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Burmese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 8.7%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.42%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age over 75 (45.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Bolivian vs Burmese Disability
Disability MetricBolivianBurmese
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
6.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.9%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.2%
Exceptional
45.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.3%