Immigrants from Northern Europe vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 474,227,690 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Immigrant from Northern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.524. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.304% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Europe corresponds to an increase of 304.0 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,159 compared to $44,440, a difference of 21.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($111,676 compared to $94,622, a difference of 18.0%), and median household income ($99,813 compared to $85,101, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($54,571 compared to $50,554, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,003 compared to $61,735, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 14.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 14.0%), and single female poverty (19.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.70%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and male poverty (9.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 13.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.5% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 15.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 13.5%), births to unmarried women (28.6% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 10.8%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.68%), currently married (48.8% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and married-couple households (48.6% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 57.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 36.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.7%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (91.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.020%), 12th grade, no diploma (93.1% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and 11th grade (94.2% compared to 94.4%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Europe and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 24.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.5%), cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 5.9%).