Hawaiian vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 325,377,539 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 7.2 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 17.1%), per capita income ($39,403 compared to $44,440, a difference of 12.8%), and median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $55,793, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($84,729 compared to $85,101, a difference of 0.44%), median female earnings ($37,497 compared to $38,397, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $102,123, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 30.8%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and single father poverty (15.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 19.3%), male unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.9%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.6%), and average family size (3.41 compared to 3.11, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (67.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.0%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 52.8%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 35.6%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 35.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.25%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.94%).