Immigrants from Uruguay vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,642,611 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.862. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.178% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 177.5 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 18.3%), householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $61,735, a difference of 8.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $102,123, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($43,997 compared to $44,440, a difference of 1.0%), median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $38,397, a difference of 1.4%), and median earnings ($45,682 compared to $46,463, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 39.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 36.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 34.4%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 22.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.0%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 10.2%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.23%), family households (63.9% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.95%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 76.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 37.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 19.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 32.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 64.5%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and college, under 1 year (63.4% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.12%), bachelor's degree (37.8% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 36.0%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 33.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.64%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 1.9%).