Osage vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,666,415 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Osage communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.349. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Osage within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.111% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Osage corresponds to a decrease of 111.1 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Osage and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,390 compared to $102,123, a difference of 15.5%), median family income ($91,926 compared to $104,288, a difference of 13.5%), and median household income ($75,240 compared to $85,101, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($36,034 compared to $38,397, a difference of 6.6%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and median earnings ($42,651 compared to $46,463, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Osage and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 27.6%), family poverty (9.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.2%), single mother poverty (32.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Osage and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 17.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Osage and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 0.65%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.0% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Osage and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.8%), and divorced or separated (13.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (32.1% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.7% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Osage and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.44%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.8% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Osage and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 24.2%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 23.2%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.34%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Osage and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 17.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.5% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and vision disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.3%).