Native/Alaskan vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,147,753 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.553. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to a decrease of 14.0 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $44,440, a difference of 33.5%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $104,288, a difference of 28.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $102,123, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $50,554, a difference of 6.0%), median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $38,397, a difference of 13.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $61,735, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 91.9%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 79.5%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 21.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 21.9%), and single father poverty (22.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 62.4%), male unemployment (7.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 60.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 51.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.94%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.7%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 39.4%), and births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 55.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 10.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.56%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 58.8%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 54.1%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.71%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (30.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 28.9%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 7.2%).