Immigrants from Malaysia vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,559,284 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.281% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 281.3 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($43,835 compared to $38,397, a difference of 14.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,650 compared to $94,622, a difference of 13.8%), and median household income ($96,292 compared to $85,101, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $61,735, a difference of 6.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $50,554, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,796 compared to $102,123, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 19.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.10%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.92%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 22.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 16.0%), divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 15.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 0.82%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 100.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 8.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 16.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 23.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 65.5%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.3%), and professional degree (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 50.1%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 36.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 0.73%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.4%).