Immigrants from Nicaragua vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,341,771 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Immigrant from Nicaragua communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Nicaragua within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Nicaragua corresponds to an increase of 17.9 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 26.8%), householder income over 65 years ($52,085 compared to $61,735, a difference of 18.5%), and median family income ($88,267 compared to $104,288, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,266 compared to $50,554, a difference of 5.4%), median female earnings ($36,023 compared to $38,397, a difference of 6.6%), and median household income ($76,784 compared to $85,101, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 74.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 73.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 67.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 0.68%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 27.4%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.6% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 32.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.9% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 29.1%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 19.7%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.1%), family households (67.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 4.6%), and divorced or separated (13.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 46.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 3.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 117.4%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.9%), and master's degree (11.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 1.8%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Nicaragua and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 43.1%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 39.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.61%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 2.2%).