Barbadian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty
COMPARE
Barbadian
Chickasaw
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Barbadians
Chickasaw
13.6%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.5%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
273rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Barbadian vs Chickasaw Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,266,401 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Barbadians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.058 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,660,855 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047 and weighted average of 13.5%, a difference of 0.70%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Barbadian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 2.2% |
| Maximum | 28.7% | 33.0% |
| Range | 27.1% | 30.8% |
| Mean | 12.5% | 15.0% |
| Median | 12.2% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.2% | 11.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.7% | 18.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.6% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.5% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Barbadians and Chickasaw by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Barbadians are Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 0.34%), Belizean (13.6%, a difference of 0.44%), Haitian (13.7%, a difference of 0.61%), and Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from West Indies (13.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Bahamas (13.5%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Latin America (13.6%, a difference of 0.89%), Bangladeshi (13.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and Spanish American (13.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #269 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Cree | 0.0 /100 | #270 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 13.5% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 13.6% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 13.7% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 13.8% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 13.8% |