Barbadian vs Asian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,073,861 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Asians within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.563. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.676% in Asians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to a decrease of 1,676.0 Asians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 42.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $118,426, a difference of 31.2%), and median family income ($93,919 compared to $119,955, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $44,586, a difference of 8.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,202 compared to $57,003, a difference of 9.2%), and median earnings ($45,846 compared to $53,690, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 70.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 49.0%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.7%), single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 18.1%), and single female poverty (21.8% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 19.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 34.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 33.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 73.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.46%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 41.4%), births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 38.0%), and married-couple households (39.4% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.28, a difference of 0.36%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (62.5% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 190.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 79.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 65.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 23.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 48.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 65.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 50.8%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.1%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.23%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Asian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 25.6%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 4.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.3%).