Barbadian vs Immigrants from Dominican Republic Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,224,584 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Dominican Republic within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.178% in Immigrants from Dominican Republic. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to a decrease of 178.0 Immigrants from Dominican Republic.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,163 compared to $45,758, a difference of 18.4%), median family income ($93,919 compared to $81,233, a difference of 15.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $78,836, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,202 compared to $50,204, a difference of 4.0%), wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and median male earnings ($51,236 compared to $46,655, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 34.1%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 33.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 27.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 5.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 6.1%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 18.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.5% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 71.2%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.1%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.5% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.4%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.35, a difference of 1.9%), and currently married (40.6% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 20.6%), no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 31.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 19.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 30.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 26.0%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.84%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Dominican Republic communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 15.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.3% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.5%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.3%).