Barbadian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 50,137,136 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.792. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.117% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to an increase of 117.0 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 38.8%), householder income over 65 years ($54,163 compared to $65,854, a difference of 21.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $106,849, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $40,798, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,202 compared to $51,259, a difference of 1.8%), and median earnings ($45,846 compared to $48,229, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 74.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 54.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.2%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 45.4%), male unemployment (6.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 43.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 24.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.68%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 30.3%), births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 28.8%), and married-couple households (39.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.4%), family households (62.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 188.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 64.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 23.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 49.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 61.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 50.3%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.1%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.7%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.4%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.040%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.5%).