Barbadian vs Immigrants from Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,077,092 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 1.117% in Immigrants from Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to a decrease of 1,116.6 Immigrants from Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 42.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $116,566, a difference of 29.1%), and median family income ($93,919 compared to $118,291, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $44,198, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,202 compared to $56,379, a difference of 8.0%), and median earnings ($45,846 compared to $53,310, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 66.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 44.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 44.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.4%), single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 16.6%), and single female poverty (21.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 17.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 33.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 32.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 73.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 41.0%), births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 38.0%), and married-couple households (39.4% compared to 49.1%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.27, a difference of 0.70%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and family households (62.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 140.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 73.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 61.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 20.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 47.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 61.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 50.6%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 33.0%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 24.3%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 23.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.7%).