Barbadian vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,799,679 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.171. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Immigrants from Eastern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to an increase of 71.5 Immigrants from Eastern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 20.4%), householder income over 65 years ($54,163 compared to $61,157, a difference of 12.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $98,467, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $40,644, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,202 compared to $51,158, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,565 compared to $91,458, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 42.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 32.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (21.8% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 1.3%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 34.9%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 34.1%), and male unemployment (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 30.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 19.4%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 15.5%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (62.5% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 159.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 46.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 21.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 40.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 43.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 31.0%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 16.2%), and bachelor's degree (36.1% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.22%), 3rd grade (97.2% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 20.8%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 3.6%).