Basque vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Basque
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Basques

Zimbabweans

Good
Exceptional
6,979
SOCIAL INDEX
67.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
133rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Basque Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 48,210,622 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Basque communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Basques within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Basques corresponds to an increase of 35.0 Zimbabweans.
Basque Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Basque vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Basque and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 9.4%), median female earnings ($38,352 compared to $40,798, a difference of 6.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,653 compared to $65,854, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,818 compared to $51,259, a difference of 1.1%), per capita income ($45,086 compared to $45,804, a difference of 1.6%), and median male earnings ($55,370 compared to $56,302, a difference of 1.7%).
Basque vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricBasqueZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,086
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Good
$104,760
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Good
$87,001
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Average
$46,399
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,370
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,352
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,818
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$96,709
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,387
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,653
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.8%
Fair
26.3%

Basque vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Basque and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and single female poverty (21.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.22%), single male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.51%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.7%).
Basque vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricBasqueZimbabwean
Poverty
Excellent
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Good
10.9%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.7%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Fair
21.3%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Fair
29.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Exceptional
9.5%

Basque vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Basque and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.63%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 4.1%).
Basque vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBasqueZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%

Basque vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Basque and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.4%).
Basque vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBasqueZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.2%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.3%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.4%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
84.0%

Basque vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Basque and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.9%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.45%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.95%), and family households (64.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.98%).
Basque vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBasqueZimbabwean
Family Households
Excellent
64.7%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.1%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.7%
Exceptional
28.7%

Basque vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Basque and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 19.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.2%), and no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.4%).
Basque vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBasqueZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.4%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.3%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Good
6.4%

Basque vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Basque and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 20.9%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.3%), and bachelor's degree (37.7% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
Basque vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricBasqueZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
91.8%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Excellent
89.8%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.4%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.9%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.7%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Excellent
4.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.3%

Basque vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Basque and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.5%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.2%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.3%).
Basque vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricBasqueZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Poor
5.7%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.4%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.5%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Fair
47.6%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%