Romanian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Romanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Romanians

Zimbabweans

Excellent
Exceptional
9,022
SOCIAL INDEX
87.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
35th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Romanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,535,215 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Romanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.413. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Romanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.024% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Romanians corresponds to an increase of 23.9 Zimbabweans.
Romanian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Romanian vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Romanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($60,063 compared to $56,302, a difference of 6.7%), wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.3%), and per capita income ($48,445 compared to $45,804, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($111,243 compared to $110,011, a difference of 1.1%), median household income ($91,994 compared to $90,618, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,609 compared to $106,849, a difference of 1.7%).
Romanian vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricRomanianZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,445
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,243
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$91,994
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,244
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$60,063
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,663
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,632
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,544
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,609
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,142
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Fair
26.3%

Romanian vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Romanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 18.6%), receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.34%), single female poverty (19.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.7%).
Romanian vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricRomanianZimbabwean
Poverty
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.0%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.5%

Romanian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Romanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.4%).
Romanian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricRomanianZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.3%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%

Romanian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Romanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.96%).
Romanian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricRomanianZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.5%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Good
84.8%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Good
84.5%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Exceptional
84.0%

Romanian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Romanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.7%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and currently married (48.4% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 0.20%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.61%), and family households (64.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.75%).
Romanian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricRomanianZimbabwean
Family Households
Good
64.5%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.4%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.7%
Exceptional
28.7%

Romanian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 21.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.0%).
Romanian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricRomanianZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Poor
10.9%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.2%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Average
55.5%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Good
6.4%

Romanian vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Romanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.0%), bachelor's degree (41.6% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and associate's degree (49.7% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.040%).
Romanian vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricRomanianZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.7%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.8%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.7%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.4%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.7%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.6%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.2%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.3%

Romanian vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Romanian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 13.2%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.6%).
Romanian vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricRomanianZimbabwean
Disability
Good
11.6%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Fair
1.3%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.6%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%