Italian vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Italian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Italians

Zimbabweans

Excellent
Exceptional
8,365
SOCIAL INDEX
81.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
74th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Italian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,188,573 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Italian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.588. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Italians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Italians corresponds to an increase of 8.9 Zimbabweans.
Italian Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Italian vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Italian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 6.8%), median male earnings ($59,551 compared to $56,302, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,215 compared to $98,586, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,505 compared to $40,798, a difference of 1.7%), median household income ($92,475 compared to $90,618, a difference of 2.1%), and median family income ($112,372 compared to $110,011, a difference of 2.1%).
Italian vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricItalianZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,574
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,372
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$92,475
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,915
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,551
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,505
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,426
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,215
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$110,224
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,885
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.1%
Fair
26.3%

Italian vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Italian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 12.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.090%), single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and single female poverty (19.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.31%).
Italian vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricItalianZimbabwean
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.3%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.2%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.6%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.5%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.3%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.5%

Italian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Italian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 14.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.97%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
Italian vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricItalianZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Fair
6.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.0%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%

Italian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Italian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.2%).
Italian vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricItalianZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.6%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Excellent
79.9%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.1%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.6%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Exceptional
84.0%

Italian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Italian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.6%), births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 7.2%), and family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.2%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and average family size (3.12 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.6%).
Italian vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricItalianZimbabwean
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.0%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.12
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.8%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.8%
Exceptional
28.7%

Italian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Italian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 2.1%).
Italian vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricItalianZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.4%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Good
6.4%

Italian vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Italian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.9%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and professional degree (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%).
Italian vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricItalianZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.2%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.2%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.1%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.7%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.1%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.4%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Exceptional
2.3%

Italian vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Italian and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 32.1%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (45.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 6.4%).
Italian vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricItalianZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.6%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Good
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%