Mexican vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,159,694 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Mexican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.217. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexicans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexicans corresponds to a decrease of 0.9 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,559 compared to $45,804, a difference of 32.5%), median family income ($85,618 compared to $110,011, a difference of 28.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,816 compared to $106,849, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.0%), householder income under 25 years ($49,989 compared to $51,259, a difference of 2.5%), and median earnings ($39,834 compared to $48,229, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 75.9%), receiving food stamps (14.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 54.3%), and family poverty (11.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 51.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.21%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and single male poverty (14.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 27.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 26.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (81.6% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 34.6%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.45%), currently married (45.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 38.8%), no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 28.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 94.0%), no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 90.7%), and professional degree (2.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 89.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.3%).