Senegalese vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Senegalese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Senegalese

Zimbabweans

Poor
Exceptional
1,684
SOCIAL INDEX
14.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
292nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Senegalese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,919,876 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Senegalese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.452. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Senegalese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Senegalese corresponds to an increase of 96.8 Zimbabweans.
Senegalese Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Senegalese vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Senegalese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 27.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,897 compared to $106,849, a difference of 23.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,591 compared to $65,854, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,384 compared to $40,798, a difference of 3.6%), householder income under 25 years ($48,953 compared to $51,259, a difference of 4.7%), and median earnings ($44,373 compared to $48,229, a difference of 8.7%).
Senegalese vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricSenegaleseZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,000
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,475
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Tragic
$74,999
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,373
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,774
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,384
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$48,953
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,852
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$86,897
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,591
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.7%
Fair
26.3%

Senegalese vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Senegalese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 62.3%), married-couple family poverty (6.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 49.2%), and family poverty (11.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.15%), single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and single mother poverty (31.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 10.9%).
Senegalese vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricSenegaleseZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.0%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.3%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
23.0%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.4%
Exceptional
9.5%

Senegalese vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Senegalese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 35.8%), male unemployment (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 34.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 8.8%).
Senegalese vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSenegaleseZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.5%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%

Senegalese vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Senegalese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 0.82%).
Senegalese vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSenegaleseZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.9%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.8%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
84.0%

Senegalese vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Senegalese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 35.8%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 28.1%), and married-couple households (38.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.21 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.46%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.9%).
Senegalese vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSenegaleseZimbabwean
Family Households
Tragic
59.8%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
38.6%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.2%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
40.6%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Exceptional
28.7%

Senegalese vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Senegalese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 118.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 49.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (80.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 13.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (44.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 29.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 42.4%).
Senegalese vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSenegaleseZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
19.8%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
80.4%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
44.2%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.2%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.3%
Good
6.4%

Senegalese vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Senegalese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 32.5%), master's degree (15.2% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 16.4%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.61%).
Senegalese vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricSenegaleseZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.9%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.7%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.0%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
58.2%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.2%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Good
15.2%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Exceptional
2.3%

Senegalese vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Senegalese and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.4%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.31%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 7.1%).
Senegalese vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricSenegaleseZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.9%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%