Slovak vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Slovak
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Slovaks

Zimbabweans

Good
Exceptional
6,550
SOCIAL INDEX
63.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
150th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Slovak Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,138,602 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Slovak communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.615. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slovaks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.038% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slovaks corresponds to an increase of 38.0 Zimbabweans.
Slovak Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Slovak vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slovak and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,039 compared to $65,854, a difference of 11.5%), wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and median household income ($83,798 compared to $90,618, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,306 compared to $56,302, a difference of 0.010%), median earnings ($47,095 compared to $48,229, a difference of 2.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($49,753 compared to $51,259, a difference of 3.0%).
Slovak vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricSlovakZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,229
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Good
$103,729
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,798
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Good
$47,095
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,306
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$39,029
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,753
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,032
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$101,029
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,039
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.9%
Fair
26.3%

Slovak vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slovak and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (19.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 23.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.6% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.17%), male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.46%).
Slovak vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricSlovakZimbabwean
Poverty
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.6%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.1%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Fair
21.1%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.3%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.4%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.8%
Exceptional
9.5%

Slovak vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slovak and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%).
Slovak vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSlovakZimbabwean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.4%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%

Slovak vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slovak and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Slovak vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSlovakZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.9%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
42.6%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.7%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Exceptional
84.0%

Slovak vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slovak and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 16.3%), family households with children (25.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 8.6%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.43%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Slovak vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSlovakZimbabwean
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.7%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.6%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.06
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.3%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.4%
Exceptional
28.7%

Slovak vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.87%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.3%).
Slovak vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSlovakZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Good
6.4%

Slovak vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slovak and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.7%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.2%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
Slovak vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricSlovakZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.3%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.7%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.5%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.3%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Average
14.9%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.3%

Slovak vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.6%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 26.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.5%), disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.2%).
Slovak vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricSlovakZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.5%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.8%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Exceptional
2.2%