Seminole vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Seminole
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Zimbabwean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Seminole

Zimbabweans

Poor
Exceptional
2,239
SOCIAL INDEX
19.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
265th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Zimbabwean Integration in Seminole Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,893,882 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Seminole communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.984. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Seminole within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Seminole corresponds to an increase of 27.7 Zimbabweans.
Seminole Integration in Zimbabwean Communities

Seminole vs Zimbabwean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Seminole and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,077 compared to $106,849, a difference of 33.4%), median family income ($83,354 compared to $110,011, a difference of 32.0%), and median household income ($69,420 compared to $90,618, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 3.0%), householder income under 25 years ($45,649 compared to $51,259, a difference of 12.3%), and median female earnings ($34,385 compared to $40,798, a difference of 18.6%).
Seminole vs Zimbabwean Income
Income MetricSeminoleZimbabwean
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,180
Exceptional
$45,804
Median Family Income
Tragic
$83,354
Exceptional
$110,011
Median Household Income
Tragic
$69,420
Exceptional
$90,618
Median Earnings
Tragic
$40,233
Exceptional
$48,229
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,783
Excellent
$56,302
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,385
Exceptional
$40,798
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,649
Tragic
$51,259
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$76,584
Exceptional
$98,586
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$80,077
Exceptional
$106,849
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,373
Exceptional
$65,854
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.6%
Fair
26.3%

Seminole vs Zimbabwean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Seminole and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 57.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 56.6%), and receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 16.4%).
Seminole vs Zimbabwean Poverty
Poverty MetricSeminoleZimbabwean
Poverty
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
Males
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Tragic
16.9%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.9%
Fair
20.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
22.8%
Exceptional
15.2%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
14.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
21.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
14.4%
Single Males
Tragic
16.0%
Poor
13.1%
Single Females
Tragic
26.8%
Exceptional
19.5%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
15.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
35.8%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
9.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.2%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
9.5%

Seminole vs Zimbabwean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Seminole and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 22.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 10.1%).
Seminole vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSeminoleZimbabwean
Unemployment
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
15.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.8%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.1%
Average
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%

Seminole vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Seminole and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 3.5%).
Seminole vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSeminoleZimbabwean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.0%
Exceptional
67.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.5%
Exceptional
81.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.1%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.3%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
81.7%
Fair
84.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.8%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.4%
Exceptional
86.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.1%
Exceptional
84.0%

Seminole vs Zimbabwean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Seminole and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 32.1%), divorced or separated (14.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 23.2%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.12%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.2%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Seminole vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSeminoleZimbabwean
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Fair
64.1%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.5%
Exceptional
27.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.0%
Excellent
47.4%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Poor
3.20
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.4%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.6%
Good
47.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
28.7%

Seminole vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Seminole and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.11%), no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Seminole vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSeminoleZimbabwean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.0%
Exceptional
9.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.1%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Exceptional
57.2%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Excellent
20.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Good
6.4%

Seminole vs Zimbabwean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Seminole and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 70.7%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 62.8%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
Seminole vs Zimbabwean Education Level
Education Level MetricSeminoleZimbabwean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Good
96.2%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Good
95.8%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Average
94.8%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Poor
93.3%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Exceptional
93.9%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.4%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.3%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.8%
Exceptional
88.0%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.1%
Exceptional
69.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
52.1%
Exceptional
64.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.7%
Exceptional
51.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
43.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
17.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.3%

Seminole vs Zimbabwean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Seminole and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 55.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 51.7%), and ambulatory disability (8.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 21.8%).
Seminole vs Zimbabwean Disability
Disability MetricSeminoleZimbabwean
Disability
Tragic
14.9%
Exceptional
10.9%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.8%
Good
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.4%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
15.9%
Exceptional
10.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
29.4%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
51.5%
Tragic
48.1%
Vision
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Excellent
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.3%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%