African vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,307,732 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within African communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.147. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Africans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Africans corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,925 compared to $106,849, a difference of 25.8%), median family income ($87,820 compared to $110,011, a difference of 25.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,986 compared to $98,586, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($46,838 compared to $51,259, a difference of 9.4%), median female earnings ($36,530 compared to $40,798, a difference of 11.7%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 59.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 53.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 52.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (22.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.8%), single male poverty (14.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 12.5%), and single father poverty (18.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 32.7%), male unemployment (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 29.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 38.4%), single mother households (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.8%), and married-couple households (40.9% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.7%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households (62.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 36.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 44.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 41.6%), and master's degree (12.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.46%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between African and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 29.9%), vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.4%), and ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.9% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 7.2%).