Immigrants from Lebanon vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,687,001 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Lebanon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lebanon within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lebanon corresponds to a decrease of 2.0 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 4.7%), median male earnings ($58,835 compared to $56,302, a difference of 4.5%), and median earnings ($49,682 compared to $48,229, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($110,159 compared to $110,011, a difference of 0.13%), median female earnings ($41,183 compared to $40,798, a difference of 0.94%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,729 compared to $51,259, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 60.8%), family poverty (9.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and receiving food stamps (11.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (19.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 0.20%), single mother poverty (28.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 18.9%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 13.3%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.3%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and currently married (48.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 7.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.70%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 33.4%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 69.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.43%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.47%), disability (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.84%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.92%).