Paraguayan vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,689,166 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Paraguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.676. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Paraguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.331% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Paraguayans corresponds to an increase of 331.2 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,385 compared to $45,804, a difference of 10.0%), householder income under 25 years ($55,614 compared to $51,259, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,615 compared to $98,586, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 1.9%), householder income over 65 years ($64,443 compared to $65,854, a difference of 2.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,447 compared to $106,849, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 26.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 19.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.38%), single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.0% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.39%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.45%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 14.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.7%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.1%), and births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.040%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.14%), and currently married (47.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 58.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 13.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.6%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.40%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Paraguayan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 67.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.43%), disability (10.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.7%).