Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,373,017 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.589. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to an increase of 6.1 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $51,259, a difference of 8.4%), median male earnings ($60,958 compared to $56,302, a difference of 8.3%), and per capita income ($49,316 compared to $45,804, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.24%), median family income ($112,527 compared to $110,011, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($109,335 compared to $106,849, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 19.6%), receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 14.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.26%), female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.0%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.11%), family households (64.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 50.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 4.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 16.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 17.5%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and college, under 1 year (67.9% compared to 69.9%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.31%), and 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.0%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.80%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.8% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and male disability (10.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.6%).