Immigrants from Ghana vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,632,962 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.002. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.3% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 17.9%), median family income ($96,544 compared to $110,011, a difference of 14.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,982 compared to $106,849, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.14%), median female earnings ($39,894 compared to $40,798, a difference of 2.3%), and median earnings ($45,641 compared to $48,229, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 48.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 45.2%), and family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.56%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 31.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 29.7%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 31.7%), births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 83.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 25.4%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 9.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 20.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 50.8%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.8%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.91%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.1%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 0.69%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 3.0%).