Moroccan vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,474,970 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Moroccan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.428. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Moroccans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.267% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Moroccans corresponds to an increase of 267.0 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,683 compared to $65,854, a difference of 10.3%), wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,138 compared to $106,849, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($45,854 compared to $45,804, a difference of 0.11%), median male earnings ($56,499 compared to $56,302, a difference of 0.35%), and median earnings ($48,838 compared to $48,229, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 39.0%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 34.6%), and family poverty (9.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.33%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother poverty (29.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 10.8%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.78%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 0.96%), and family households (61.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 62.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 6.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.8% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.5%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and bachelor's degree (40.5% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Moroccan and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.4%), ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.3%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.020%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.4%).