Swiss vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison
COMPARE
Swiss
Zimbabwean
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Swiss
Zimbabweans
7,517
SOCIAL INDEX
72.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
114th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,358
SOCIAL INDEX
91.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
18th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Zimbabwean Integration in Swiss Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 67,477,083 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.077. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Zimbabweans.
Swiss vs Zimbabwean Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 13.9%), median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $40,798, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,621 compared to $65,854, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.46%), median male earnings ($55,731 compared to $56,302, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,511 compared to $98,586, a difference of 3.2%).
Income Metric | Swiss | Zimbabwean |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,076 | Exceptional $45,804 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,396 | Exceptional $110,011 |
Median Household Income | Average $85,681 | Exceptional $90,618 |
Median Earnings | Average $46,315 | Exceptional $48,229 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,731 | Excellent $56,302 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,904 | Exceptional $40,798 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,493 | Tragic $51,259 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,511 | Exceptional $98,586 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $103,071 | Exceptional $106,849 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,621 | Exceptional $65,854 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 30.0% | Fair 26.3% |
Swiss vs Zimbabwean Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.9%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and single female poverty (21.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.070%), female poverty (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and poverty (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.43%).
Poverty Metric | Swiss | Zimbabwean |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Families | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.2% | Fair 20.4% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.4% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.1% | Exceptional 15.2% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Poor 13.1% |
Single Females | Fair 21.4% | Exceptional 19.5% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.3% | Exceptional 15.6% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.2% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Swiss vs Zimbabwean Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and male unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Swiss | Zimbabwean |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Males | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Females | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.4% | Exceptional 6.4% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.9% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.5% | Average 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Exceptional 7.3% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Swiss vs Zimbabwean Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 11.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Swiss | Zimbabwean |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.4% | Exceptional 67.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Exceptional 81.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.3% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.7% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.7% | Fair 84.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Exceptional 85.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Exceptional 86.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Swiss vs Zimbabwean Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.7%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and currently married (49.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.88%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (65.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Swiss | Zimbabwean |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Fair 64.1% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.9% | Excellent 47.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Poor 3.20 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Excellent 6.1% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.7% | Good 47.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Exceptional 28.7% |
Swiss vs Zimbabwean Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.4%), no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Swiss | Zimbabwean |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 9.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.0% | Exceptional 57.2% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.0% | Excellent 20.3% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Good 6.4% |
Swiss vs Zimbabwean Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 20.2%), bachelor's degree (37.2% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 16.3%), and professional degree (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.16%), 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.19%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.26%).
Education Level Metric | Swiss | Zimbabwean |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.7% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.3% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 97.6% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.3% | Exceptional 96.8% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Exceptional 96.5% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Exceptional 93.9% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.6% | Exceptional 91.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.0% | Exceptional 88.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Average 65.5% | Exceptional 69.9% |
College, 1 year or more | Average 59.2% | Exceptional 64.2% |
Associate's Degree | Average 46.0% | Exceptional 51.3% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 37.2% | Exceptional 43.3% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.7% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Swiss vs Zimbabwean Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 38.7%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.7%), and male disability (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 4.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.6%).
Disability Metric | Swiss | Zimbabwean |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Poor 12.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Good 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.4% | Good 6.5% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 48.1% |
Vision | Average 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Excellent 2.8% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Tragic 17.6% |
Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |