Dutch vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 68,961,029 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Dutch communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 12.6%), householder income over 65 years ($59,539 compared to $65,854, a difference of 10.6%), and median female earnings ($37,339 compared to $40,798, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,265 compared to $51,259, a difference of 0.010%), median male earnings ($54,410 compared to $56,302, a difference of 3.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,081 compared to $98,586, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.1%), single father poverty (17.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and single female poverty (22.0% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.22%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 0.41%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.65%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 9.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.20, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 32.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.6% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.8%), master's degree (13.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 28.4%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.9% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.22%), high school diploma (91.3% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.26%), and nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 42.9%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.6%), and male disability (12.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 8.3%).