Immigrants from Congo vs Zimbabwean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,638,349 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.144% in Zimbabweans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 143.9 Zimbabweans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $106,849, a difference of 37.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $98,586, a difference of 36.6%), and median household income ($66,768 compared to $90,618, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($43,266 compared to $51,259, a difference of 18.5%), median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $40,798, a difference of 18.9%), and wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 21.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 59.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (22.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 58.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.3%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 29.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 25.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.67%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 86.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 67.3%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 33.8%), births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 28.7%, a difference of 28.2%), and married-couple households (39.0% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.20, a difference of 0.94%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (59.2% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 19.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 9.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 42.7%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 42.5%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.71%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.72%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Zimbabwean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 27.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 48.1%, a difference of 1.4%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.4%).